Weekly Discussion Monday, 11 May 2020, 10:08 PM Number of replies: 63 Determine whether following relation is transitive or not. If not then what pair is missing.R={(1,2),(2,1),(1,1),(3,2)} Permalink In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Al Amin 193-15-2981 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:21 AM not because (2,2) missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Al Amin 193-15-2981 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Ifty Ar alam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:22 AM its not transistive(3,1) is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Ifty Ar alam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Sabrina Islam 193-15-2941 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:23 AM Not transitive(2,2) is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Sabrina Islam 193-15-2941 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by MD RAKIBUL ISLAM(193-15-3015) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:24 AM not .(2,2)ni Permalink Show parent In reply to MD RAKIBUL ISLAM(193-15-3015) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:57 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by RAKIBUL ISLAM - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:24 AM (2,2) is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to RAKIBUL ISLAM Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Muhammad Shahedul Islam (193-15-2997) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:24 AM It is not transitive. missing {(3,1),(2,2)} Permalink Show parent In reply to Muhammad Shahedul Islam (193-15-2997) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:24 AM Transitive Permalink Show parent In reply to wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) Re: Weekly Discussion by wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:31 AM not transitive2,2 is missinghere Permalink Show parent In reply to wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM No. For (2,1) and (1,2) pair (2,2) pair is missing. Also for (3,2) and (2,1) pair (3,1) pair is missing. So the relation is not transitive. Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by MD Nahid Hasan 3006 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:25 AM (2,2) Permalink Show parent In reply to MD Nahid Hasan 3006 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Tamanna Akter (193-15-2937) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:25 AM transitive not becouse (2,2) is missing. Permalink Show parent In reply to Tamanna Akter (193-15-2937) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Ata-E-Elahi 193-15-2946 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:26 AM not transitivemissing pair=(2,2),(3,1) Permalink Show parent In reply to Ata-E-Elahi 193-15-2946 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by abdullah al taky 193-15-2917 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:26 AM not transitive because (2,2) missing..... Permalink Show parent In reply to abdullah al taky 193-15-2917 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by NUSRAT JAHAN (193-15-2924) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:26 AM not (2,2) missing Permalink Show parent In reply to NUSRAT JAHAN (193-15-2924) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Sakib Khan Mahin 193-15-3020 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:28 AM The relation is not transitive and the missing pair is (2,2). Permalink Show parent In reply to Sakib Khan Mahin 193-15-3020 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Most.Kamrun Naher Shuchana 193-15-2926 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:28 AM Not because pair(2,2)is missin. Permalink Show parent In reply to Most.Kamrun Naher Shuchana 193-15-2926 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by RIFAT ahmed (193-15-2911) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:30 AM transitive not because (2,2) is missing. Permalink Show parent In reply to RIFAT ahmed (193-15-2911) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Razia Sultana Misu(193-15-2976) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:31 AM (2,2) is missing pair. Permalink Show parent In reply to Razia Sultana Misu(193-15-2976) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Faria Binta Kalam(193-15-2918) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:33 AM (2,2) is missing pair Permalink Show parent In reply to Faria Binta Kalam(193-15-2918) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by MD . Shariar Fahim(193-15-2996) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:33 AM (2,2) is missing pair Permalink Show parent In reply to MD . Shariar Fahim(193-15-2996) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Abdul Wahid 193-15-2992 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:34 AM Not transitive because (2,2) and (3,1) are missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Abdul Wahid 193-15-2992 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:35 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:35 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:35 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:36 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:36 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:39 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Md.Eamon Rahman (193-15-2967) - Saturday, 27 June 2020, 8:29 PM 2,2 is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Md.Eamon Rahman (193-15-2967) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:50 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent In reply to Md.Eamon Rahman (193-15-2967) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:51 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Md.Atiqur Rahman - Saturday, 27 June 2020, 8:30 PM Not because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Md.Atiqur Rahman Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:50 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to Md.Atiqur Rahman Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:51 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Al-Ifran (193-15-2915) - Friday, 7 August 2020, 1:37 PM Not transitive Because, (2,2) is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Al-Ifran (193-15-2915) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:50 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to Al-Ifran (193-15-2915) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:51 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:50 AM For (2,1) and (1,2) pair (2,2) pair is missing. Also for (3,2) and (2,1) pair (3,1) pair is missing. So the relation is not transitive. Permalink Show parent In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Joshinta Jerin - Friday, 28 August 2020, 11:33 PM its not transistive (3,1) is missing Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Al Amin 193-15-2981 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:21 AM not because (2,2) missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Al Amin 193-15-2981 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Al Amin 193-15-2981 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Ifty Ar alam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:22 AM its not transistive(3,1) is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Ifty Ar alam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Ifty Ar alam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Sabrina Islam 193-15-2941 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:23 AM Not transitive(2,2) is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Sabrina Islam 193-15-2941 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Sabrina Islam 193-15-2941 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by MD RAKIBUL ISLAM(193-15-3015) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:24 AM not .(2,2)ni Permalink Show parent In reply to MD RAKIBUL ISLAM(193-15-3015) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:57 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to MD RAKIBUL ISLAM(193-15-3015) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:57 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by RAKIBUL ISLAM - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:24 AM (2,2) is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to RAKIBUL ISLAM Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to RAKIBUL ISLAM Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Muhammad Shahedul Islam (193-15-2997) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:24 AM It is not transitive. missing {(3,1),(2,2)} Permalink Show parent In reply to Muhammad Shahedul Islam (193-15-2997) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Muhammad Shahedul Islam (193-15-2997) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:24 AM Transitive Permalink Show parent In reply to wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) Re: Weekly Discussion by wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:31 AM not transitive2,2 is missinghere Permalink Show parent In reply to wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM No. For (2,1) and (1,2) pair (2,2) pair is missing. Also for (3,2) and (2,1) pair (3,1) pair is missing. So the relation is not transitive. Permalink Show parent
In reply to wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) Re: Weekly Discussion by wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:31 AM not transitive2,2 is missinghere Permalink Show parent In reply to wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to wasiul rashid (192-15-2869) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:56 AM No. For (2,1) and (1,2) pair (2,2) pair is missing. Also for (3,2) and (2,1) pair (3,1) pair is missing. So the relation is not transitive. Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by MD Nahid Hasan 3006 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:25 AM (2,2) Permalink Show parent In reply to MD Nahid Hasan 3006 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to MD Nahid Hasan 3006 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Tamanna Akter (193-15-2937) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:25 AM transitive not becouse (2,2) is missing. Permalink Show parent In reply to Tamanna Akter (193-15-2937) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Tamanna Akter (193-15-2937) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Ata-E-Elahi 193-15-2946 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:26 AM not transitivemissing pair=(2,2),(3,1) Permalink Show parent In reply to Ata-E-Elahi 193-15-2946 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Ata-E-Elahi 193-15-2946 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by abdullah al taky 193-15-2917 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:26 AM not transitive because (2,2) missing..... Permalink Show parent In reply to abdullah al taky 193-15-2917 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to abdullah al taky 193-15-2917 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by NUSRAT JAHAN (193-15-2924) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:26 AM not (2,2) missing Permalink Show parent In reply to NUSRAT JAHAN (193-15-2924) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to NUSRAT JAHAN (193-15-2924) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:55 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Sakib Khan Mahin 193-15-3020 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:28 AM The relation is not transitive and the missing pair is (2,2). Permalink Show parent In reply to Sakib Khan Mahin 193-15-3020 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Sakib Khan Mahin 193-15-3020 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Most.Kamrun Naher Shuchana 193-15-2926 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:28 AM Not because pair(2,2)is missin. Permalink Show parent In reply to Most.Kamrun Naher Shuchana 193-15-2926 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Most.Kamrun Naher Shuchana 193-15-2926 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:54 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by RIFAT ahmed (193-15-2911) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:30 AM transitive not because (2,2) is missing. Permalink Show parent In reply to RIFAT ahmed (193-15-2911) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to RIFAT ahmed (193-15-2911) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Razia Sultana Misu(193-15-2976) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:31 AM (2,2) is missing pair. Permalink Show parent In reply to Razia Sultana Misu(193-15-2976) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to Razia Sultana Misu(193-15-2976) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Faria Binta Kalam(193-15-2918) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:33 AM (2,2) is missing pair Permalink Show parent In reply to Faria Binta Kalam(193-15-2918) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to Faria Binta Kalam(193-15-2918) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by MD . Shariar Fahim(193-15-2996) - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:33 AM (2,2) is missing pair Permalink Show parent In reply to MD . Shariar Fahim(193-15-2996) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to MD . Shariar Fahim(193-15-2996) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:53 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Abdul Wahid 193-15-2992 - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:34 AM Not transitive because (2,2) and (3,1) are missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Abdul Wahid 193-15-2992 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Abdul Wahid 193-15-2992 Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:35 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:35 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:35 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:36 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:36 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by sahara Islam - Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 10:39 AM Not transitive because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to sahara Islam Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:52 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Md.Eamon Rahman (193-15-2967) - Saturday, 27 June 2020, 8:29 PM 2,2 is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Md.Eamon Rahman (193-15-2967) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:50 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent In reply to Md.Eamon Rahman (193-15-2967) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:51 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md.Eamon Rahman (193-15-2967) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:50 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md.Eamon Rahman (193-15-2967) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:51 AM Partially Correct. You did not mention whether the relation is trasitive or not Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Md.Atiqur Rahman - Saturday, 27 June 2020, 8:30 PM Not because pair(2,2)is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Md.Atiqur Rahman Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:50 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to Md.Atiqur Rahman Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:51 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md.Atiqur Rahman Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:50 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md.Atiqur Rahman Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:51 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Al-Ifran (193-15-2915) - Friday, 7 August 2020, 1:37 PM Not transitive Because, (2,2) is missing Permalink Show parent In reply to Al-Ifran (193-15-2915) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:50 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent In reply to Al-Ifran (193-15-2915) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:51 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Al-Ifran (193-15-2915) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:50 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to Al-Ifran (193-15-2915) Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:51 AM Correct!!! Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Tania Khatun - Saturday, 15 August 2020, 8:50 AM For (2,1) and (1,2) pair (2,2) pair is missing. Also for (3,2) and (2,1) pair (3,1) pair is missing. So the relation is not transitive. Permalink Show parent
In reply to First post Re: Weekly Discussion by Joshinta Jerin - Friday, 28 August 2020, 11:33 PM its not transistive (3,1) is missing Permalink Show parent