Answer the question by Md Assaduzzaman - Thursday, 2 December 2021, 12:15 PM Number of replies: 32 1. Which one provides strong security between caesar cipher and RSA? Why..? Permalink In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Md. Abir Rahaman - Sunday, 5 December 2021, 10:24 PM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Shorove Tajmen - Monday, 6 December 2021, 9:52 AM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by shoriful islam shakil - Monday, 6 December 2021, 5:14 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by MD. AL- HABIB ISLAM - Monday, 6 December 2021, 10:55 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by umme shawda - Wednesday, 8 December 2021, 3:37 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Rakibul Islam 191-15-2388 - Thursday, 9 December 2021, 12:55 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Md Rifat Bhuiyan - Thursday, 9 December 2021, 3:59 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Salma Akter 191-15-2387 - Thursday, 9 December 2021, 8:38 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by md.ziad hosen - Friday, 10 December 2021, 10:19 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Mehedi Firoz - Friday, 10 December 2021, 10:22 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Tanvir Hasan (191-15-2463) - Sunday, 12 December 2021, 12:25 AM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Sanzida Mukti - Sunday, 12 December 2021, 1:11 AM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Mustahsin Al Rafi - Sunday, 12 December 2021, 9:49 AM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by MD.ROBIUL HASAN - Sunday, 12 December 2021, 8:17 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Azizur Rahman - Monday, 13 December 2021, 11:13 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by ABDUR RAHMAN - Monday, 13 December 2021, 11:49 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Inam Ullah Khan(191-15-2575) - Tuesday, 14 December 2021, 12:31 PM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Sayma Islam - Tuesday, 14 December 2021, 1:04 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Ritu Biswas - Tuesday, 14 December 2021, 10:22 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Md Limon Hossen - Wednesday, 15 December 2021, 8:19 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakabl Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Kayes Uddin Fahim - Wednesday, 15 December 2021, 9:36 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Alamin Dhaly - Thursday, 16 December 2021, 6:24 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Md Shazzad - Thursday, 16 December 2021, 7:44 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Khadiza Rimi - Thursday, 16 December 2021, 10:26 PM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Azizur Rahman - Thursday, 16 December 2021, 11:25 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Deepanita Baidya - Sunday, 19 December 2021, 12:18 AM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by md.shahin alom - Tuesday, 21 December 2021, 3:52 PM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Mustahsin Al Rafi - Tuesday, 21 December 2021, 5:03 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Aysha Akter Anjuman - Tuesday, 21 December 2021, 8:58 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Aunik Hasan Mridul - Tuesday, 21 December 2021, 9:36 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Rana Ahmed - Tuesday, 21 December 2021, 11:51 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Md. Monoar Nahid Billha - Monday, 27 December 2021, 4:40 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Md. Abir Rahaman - Sunday, 5 December 2021, 10:24 PM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Shorove Tajmen - Monday, 6 December 2021, 9:52 AM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by shoriful islam shakil - Monday, 6 December 2021, 5:14 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by MD. AL- HABIB ISLAM - Monday, 6 December 2021, 10:55 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by umme shawda - Wednesday, 8 December 2021, 3:37 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Rakibul Islam 191-15-2388 - Thursday, 9 December 2021, 12:55 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Md Rifat Bhuiyan - Thursday, 9 December 2021, 3:59 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Salma Akter 191-15-2387 - Thursday, 9 December 2021, 8:38 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by md.ziad hosen - Friday, 10 December 2021, 10:19 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Mehedi Firoz - Friday, 10 December 2021, 10:22 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Tanvir Hasan (191-15-2463) - Sunday, 12 December 2021, 12:25 AM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Sanzida Mukti - Sunday, 12 December 2021, 1:11 AM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Mustahsin Al Rafi - Sunday, 12 December 2021, 9:49 AM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by MD.ROBIUL HASAN - Sunday, 12 December 2021, 8:17 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Azizur Rahman - Monday, 13 December 2021, 11:13 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by ABDUR RAHMAN - Monday, 13 December 2021, 11:49 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Inam Ullah Khan(191-15-2575) - Tuesday, 14 December 2021, 12:31 PM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Sayma Islam - Tuesday, 14 December 2021, 1:04 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Ritu Biswas - Tuesday, 14 December 2021, 10:22 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Md Limon Hossen - Wednesday, 15 December 2021, 8:19 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakabl Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Kayes Uddin Fahim - Wednesday, 15 December 2021, 9:36 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Alamin Dhaly - Thursday, 16 December 2021, 6:24 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Md Shazzad - Thursday, 16 December 2021, 7:44 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Khadiza Rimi - Thursday, 16 December 2021, 10:26 PM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Azizur Rahman - Thursday, 16 December 2021, 11:25 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Deepanita Baidya - Sunday, 19 December 2021, 12:18 AM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by md.shahin alom - Tuesday, 21 December 2021, 3:52 PM Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Mustahsin Al Rafi - Tuesday, 21 December 2021, 5:03 PM RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Aysha Akter Anjuman - Tuesday, 21 December 2021, 8:58 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Aunik Hasan Mridul - Tuesday, 21 December 2021, 9:36 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Rana Ahmed - Tuesday, 21 December 2021, 11:51 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable. Permalink Show parent
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman Re: Answer the question by Md. Monoar Nahid Billha - Monday, 27 December 2021, 4:40 PM I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. Permalink Show parent