Forum discussion on Security

Answer the question

Answer the question

by Md Assaduzzaman -
Number of replies: 32

1. Which one provides strong security between caesar cipher and RSA? Why..?

In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Md. Abir Rahaman -

Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters.

In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Shorove Tajmen -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by shoriful islam shakil -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by MD. AL- HABIB ISLAM -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by umme shawda -
RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Rakibul Islam 191-15-2388 -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Md Rifat Bhuiyan -
RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Salma Akter 191-15-2387 -
RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by md.ziad hosen -
RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Mehedi Firoz -
RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Tanvir Hasan (191-15-2463) -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Sanzida Mukti -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Mustahsin Al Rafi -
Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by MD.ROBIUL HASAN -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Azizur Rahman -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by ABDUR RAHMAN -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Inam Ullah Khan(191-15-2575) -
Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Sayma Islam -
RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Ritu Biswas -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Md Limon Hossen -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakabl
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Kayes Uddin Fahim -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Alamin Dhaly -
RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Md Shazzad -
RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Khadiza Rimi -
Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Azizur Rahman -
RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Deepanita Baidya -
Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by md.shahin alom -
Between Caesar cipher and RSA, In my opinion, RSA provides strong security. One explanation is that the Caesar Cipher exclusively employs alphabetic characters, whereas the RSA algorithm uses all types of characters.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Mustahsin Al Rafi -
RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Aysha Akter Anjuman -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Aunik Hasan Mridul -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Rana Ahmed -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography. It's not breakable.
In reply to Md Assaduzzaman

Re: Answer the question

by Md. Monoar Nahid Billha -
I think RSA provides strong security. Because the Caesar cipher is easily broken simply by trying all keys. It's not very secure. RSA security relies on the computational difficulty of factoring large integers. RSA only offers about 112 bits of security. It is an asymmetric algorithm designed for public-key cryptography.