Discussion-1

Discussion-1

by Md. Fouad Hossain Sarker -
Number of replies: 10

Home work-1: 

Please go through the abstract of the following article and critically write an overview on it. Is it a scientific and systematic one or not?

Title: Housing Finance: A Study on Public and Private Housing Finance Institutions in Bangladesh. 

For the article: Please visit our WhatsApp group. 

In reply to Md. Fouad Hossain Sarker

Re: Discussion-1

by Shaown Chowdhury -
The objective of the provided abstract is not fully adherent to its proper format of scientific abstract, which usually is Introduction, Objective, Methods, Results, and Conclusion. The abstract provides a general overview of Bangladesh’s housing finance system. Even though the transformation of Bangladesh’s housing finance system, its impression, and key players are part of the flow, they do not give us enough specifics on methodology, findings, and analysis, thus making it more like a descriptive overview than a formally written scientific abstract.

Critical Overview

Strong Point of the Abstract:
Articulate analysis of the housing finance landscape includes describing its connection to economic development and poverty alleviation.

Weak Point of the Abstract:
There is no precise research aim or hypothesis. There is no methodological framework and empirical data. Results and conclusions should have been better presented.

Conclusion:

This abstract is informative but not fully scientific because of the lack of smart methodology. It serves as a broad discussion rather than a structured research summary. Inferring from the uncovered methodological issue. There are problems to be addressed; for instance, the data analysis process must be conducted in a time-efficient manner. To improve, it should specify the research methods to be used, list the key findings, and present the conclusions in a more structured and systematic approach. So from my point of view, the abstract is informative but not fully scientific.
In reply to Md. Fouad Hossain Sarker

Re: Discussion-1

by Md. Al Rahat Khan -
The abstract appears to be both scientific and systematic. It presents a coherent overview of the current state and evolution of housing finance in Bangladesh, backed by relevant economic theories and data. The structure and clarity of the abstract further reinforce its systematic nature, making it a credible and informative piece of academic writing.
In reply to Md. Fouad Hossain Sarker

Re: Discussion-1

by Sadia Isalm -
The abstract is not fully scientific or systematic. It presents some concepts of housing finance in Bangladesh. It's pointing the key factors shaping housing finance, micro finance, inflation. The paper prioritizes the role of financial institutions, also House Building Finance Corporation (BHBFC), PCBs and FCBS and MFIs. But the abstract doesn’t clear the methodology, questions, data source and research method. Also there is a lack of evidence of informations.
In reply to Md. Fouad Hossain Sarker

Re: Discussion-1

by Arpan Das Gupta -
The abstract lacks a thorough scientific and methodical approach. It introduces a few ideas on house finance in Bangladesh. It highlights the main elements influencing inflation, microfinance, and housing finance. The function of financial institutions, including House Building Finance Corporation (BHBFC), PCBs, FCBS, and MFIs, is given priority in the report. However, the methodology, questions, data source, and study approach are not made apparent in the abstract. Additionally, there is a dearth of informational proof.
In reply to Md. Fouad Hossain Sarker

Re: Discussion-1

by Aman Ullah -
The abstract is not fully scientific or systematic. It presents some concepts of housing finance in Bangladesh. It's pointing the key factors shaping housing finance, micro finance, inflation. The paper prioritizes the role of financial institutions, also House Building Finance Corporation (BHBFC), PCBs and FCBS and MFIs. But the abstract doesn’t clear the methodology, questions, data source and research method. Also there is a lack of evidence of informations.
In reply to Md. Fouad Hossain Sarker

Re: Discussion-1

by Towra Chakma -
The abstract is both scientific and systematic, though it would benefit from improved clarity and a brief mention of data or methodology. It effectively introduces the topic, outlines the context, and highlights the significance of housing finance in Bangladesh’s development landscape.
In reply to Md. Fouad Hossain Sarker

Re: Discussion-1

by Ulape Chakma -
The study of Bangladesh's public and private housing financing systems can be both scientific and methodical. A scientific approach employs quantitative and statistical approaches for data collecting, hypothesis testing, and outcome analysis. A systematic method relies on a well-organized research process to ensure that conclusions are accurate and valid. As a result, if the research is done correctly, it can be scientific and systematic.
In reply to Md. Fouad Hossain Sarker

Re: Discussion-1

by SHITHILA Saha -
The objective of the provided abstract is not fully adherent to it's proper formet of scientific abstract ,which usually is introduction, objective, method, results and connsulsion.The abstract provide a general overview of Bangladesh housing finance system.its impration and key players are part of the flow,they do not give us enough specific on mathology, finding and analysis thus making it more like a descriptive overview.
Critical overview
Strong point of the abstract Abstract
Article analysis of the housing finance landscape include describe it's connected economy.