1. The contract with a rider stating an exit clause. So he can sign the contract and state that if there is a better opportunity he will take that up but serve a notice before move. This option can affect the negotiation of a team. One party has a contract for one year but we later saw that a company has proposed and has to inform him within three months and there we can see that depending on him and a lot of him. Ready to help and there we got to see more we told him in a month and from there let him know in 10 days. We couldn't see here he has enough time on his hands and this is the biggest find for a team. What we saw there was an offer to fulfill him and biggest contribution was the relationship during Kalu Shaitan's time and he got an offer before it was over and that was the biggest alternative way.
2. I will renew the contract and continue work with the same employer.
3. Accommodating:-Negotiators that exhibit this style focus on maintaining relationships with the other party. They tend to smooth over tensions, minimize differences, and are most concerned with maintaining a good rapport and satisfying the needs of the other party. This style is lower in assertiveness and higher in cooperativeness. These negotiators tend to emphasize the relationship as more important than the substance of the agreement.
Competing: - deal and results. These individuals tend to pursue their own concerns, sometimes at their counterpart’s expense, and in the extreme can become aggressive and domineering. On the assertive vs. cooperative scale, this style is higher in assertiveness and lower in cooperativeness. Using the substance vs. relationship axes, competing negotiators tend to be more focused on the substance than the relationship.
Avoiding:-Negotiators that exhibit this style are generally less assertive and apprehensive. They prefer to avoid stepping into or creating tension. They stay neutral, objective or removed from the situation or leave responsibility to their counterpart. The individual does not immediately pursue their own interests or those of the other person and there is an element of self-sacrifice in this mode. This style is low in assertiveness and in cooperativeness, and not focused on either the substance of the agreement or the relationship.
Compromising:-parties’ needs. This style is intermediate in assertiveness and cooperativeness and more focused on creating a decent agreement relatively efficiently while maintaining some relationship.
Collaborating:-Negotiators that exhibit this style are often honest and communicative. They focus on finding novel and creative solutions that fully satisfy the concerns of all parties, and suggest many ideas for consideration before deciding. This style is high in assertiveness and in cooperativeness, promoting both the relationship and the substance of the agreement at hand as very important