Case:Amir Hossain Bhuiya (Md) VS  Harisul Haq Bhuiya and others.

There comes the question that the pesh Imam, Muazzins, teachers of schools and colleges and staff members of the medical centers and hospitals are the same as workers on workmen in the factors because they get their salary from the factory fund. There the petitioner's advocate says they are not workers and the opposite party advocate says they are listed in the election of the factory as a voter. And the case file under the Act Industrial Relations ordinary 1969 and Employment of lubour (standing orders) Acts 1965.

Argument Point:

According to point (4) the trial court held a trial of the suit on the evidence and witnesses which was transferred to the Additional District Judge. (cluse 7) says that there names of 97 persons in the election's voter list of the factory who belong to different professions as Muazzins, school teacher argument comes from the plaintiff advocate that according to the employment of Labour  (standing orders) Act, 1965 section 2(v) talk about a worker. And they are not, on the other hand, the opposite party advocate says the petitioner partys argument where he is says that If a pesh Imam is not a worker within the meaning of section 2(v) of the employment of labour mosque can't also be a worker is false because the voter list us legally prepared because the hospital teaks profit from the factory fund.

Judgment:

The court says that the pesh Imam, Muazzan of the factory  Mosque, teacher of school and college, and the employee in the hospital and Medical center there are not nature workers because the hospital will be run as non-profitable and other professional members also not qualified as the opposite party advocate stayed which was not clear and justifiable to judge. So he says that they are not equated with the work done by the workers on workmen in the factory And to start the election they need to be disqualified the members from the voter list to make illegal